Nanda Nursing Classes

Intermittent vs. Indwelling Catheterization: A Comparison

Intermittent catheterization and indwelling catheterization are two distinct urinary management techniques used in medical practice.

Here’s a comparison between the two methods:

Intermittent Catheterization	Indwelling Catheterization (Foley Catheterization)
Definition: Intermittent catheterization involves the periodic insertion and removal of a catheter to empty the bladder. Purpose: It is commonly used for patients with temporary urinary retention or those needing accurate measurement of urine output. Procedure: A sterile catheter is inserted into the urethra to drain urine, and it is removed once the bladder is emptied. Indications: Temporary urinary retention, bladder dysfunction, neurological disorders affecting bladder control. Contraindications: Urethral trauma, infection, anatomical abnormalities hindering catheter insertion. Advantages: Reduced risk of long-term complications, decreased risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Disadvantages: Frequent catheterization, and potential discomfort during insertion.	Definition: Indwelling catheterization involves inserting a catheter into the bladder and leaving it in place for a specific period.Purpose: It is used for continuous drainage or when intermittent catheterization isn’t suitable due to medical conditions. Procedure: A Foley catheter with an inflatable balloon is inserted into the bladder, and the balloon is inflated to secure the catheter in place. Indications: Acute urinary retention, prolonged immobilization, surgery, monitoring critically ill patients’ urine output. Contraindications: Urethral trauma, recent genitourinary surgery, active urinary tract infection. Advantages: Less frequent catheterization, suitable for patients unable to tolerate frequent insertions. Disadvantages: Increased risk of UTIs, and potential for catheter-related complications.
Click here for the full Intermittent Catheterization procedure	Click here for the full Indwelling Catheterization procedure

Intermittent Catheterization

Indwelling Catheterization (Foley Catheterization)

Definition: Intermittent catheterization involves the periodic insertion and removal of a catheter to empty the bladder.

Purpose: It is commonly used for patients with temporary urinary retention or those needing accurate measurement of urine output.

Procedure: A sterile catheter is inserted into the urethra to drain urine, and it is removed once the bladder is emptied.

Indications: Temporary urinary retention, bladder dysfunction, neurological disorders affecting bladder control.

Contraindications: Urethral trauma, infection, anatomical abnormalities hindering catheter insertion.

Advantages: Reduced risk of long-term complications, decreased risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Disadvantages: Frequent catheterization, and potential discomfort during insertion.

Definition: Indwelling catheterization involves inserting a catheter into the bladder and leaving it in place for a specific period.Purpose: It is used for continuous drainage or when intermittent catheterization isn’t suitable due to medical conditions.

Procedure: A Foley catheter with an inflatable balloon is inserted into the bladder, and the balloon is inflated to secure the catheter in place.

Indications: Acute urinary retention, prolonged immobilization, surgery, monitoring critically ill patients’ urine output.

Contraindications: Urethral trauma, recent genitourinary surgery, active urinary tract infection.

Advantages: Less frequent catheterization, suitable for patients unable to tolerate frequent insertions.

Disadvantages: Increased risk of UTIs, and potential for catheter-related complications.

Click here for the full Intermittent Catheterization procedure

Click here for the full Indwelling Catheterization procedure

Conclusion

Intermittent catheterization is typically used for short-term management and can help prevent certain complications, while indwelling catheterization is employed when continuous urinary drainage or prolonged use is necessary. The choice between the two methods depends on the patient’s condition, medical needs, and potential risks. Healthcare professionals carefully assess each patient’s situation to determine the most appropriate urinary management approach.